Comb symbol indicates the word ‘offering’.
The comb symbol indicates the word ‘Offering.’
The above-given comb-like symbol expresses the idea of offering. Egyptian Hieroglyphics and Indus script symbols share many similarities. I searched for a similar hieroglyph and found that the ‘offering table’ hieroglyph coincides with this ‘comb’ symbol.
The only modification is that the ‘offering table’ symbol is written in a vertical orientation instead of a horizontal position.
The above-given hieroglyph indicates the ‘offering table’, which had been drawn vertically in the Indus script. Its meaning is the same as Egyptian Hieroglyphics, which means offering.
Sundar et al.’s frequency analysis table also supports the idea proposed here. (1) The extracts of the frequency analysis table are given below:
The positional analysis of the comb symbol within an inscription:
Solus |
Initial |
Median |
Final |
total |
1 |
-0- |
38 |
316 |
355 |
Table 1: Positional analysis table of comb symbol Data courtesy — (1)
The above frequency analysis shows that this comb symbol was predominantly used as a terminal sign. The best example of a terminal sign is the ‘Kavu’ symbol, which represents sacrifice. Here, the comb sign stands for the similar idea of ‘offering’.
|
Kavu – offering. The pairing of the symbol is not meaningful, whereas the triplet of these symbols brings out the real meaning. the meaningful triplet is given below in a separate table |
184 |
Messenger god offering |
26 |
|
|
Astaka -offering Astaka means eight; this pair of symbols indicates the idea of an offering made on the eighth day, which belongs to Astaka (God Rudra) |
11 |
|
Offering kavu |
10 |
Table 2: Comb symbol combinations.
The frequency distribution analysis in this table gives a different picture. The first observation is that the comb symbol appears along with ‘The Kavu symbol in the final position in 184 instances. This combination and terminal area confirm that the grapheme of ‘Comb’ means ‘offering’. The other observation is that the second-largest frequency (26) is linked with the messenger god symbol .
The above frequency analysis table of Sundar et al. does not give a satisfactory result. Hence, I did the full review by reading the all-seal inscription and determining which god the sacrifice was made towards. I have taken all seals where the
comb symbol appears . There are 115 seals taken into consideration, and the seal pictures were extracted from the book of Sue Sullivan. (2) The details are given below:
Simply Pithru sacrifice |
11 |
Comb symbol twice – |
6 |
Gatekeeper god |
10 |
Rudra symbol |
5 |
Fork symbol |
8 |
Messenger god |
5 |
Seals damaged – Symbols not clear |
7 |
Trishul symbol |
5 |
Karkida god (Rudra) |
7 |
Pithru with a leg in bondage |
4 |
Karuppa-swami (God-carrying stick) |
7 |
Spear combination |
4 |
Ningishzida |
6 |
x- god (god of death) |
3 |
Many gods |
6 |
||
God (Zakhastha)/ (Sastha) |
6 |
Three mountains |
2 |
‘ka’ symbol (up- raised hands) |
1 |
Pusan (goat logo) |
2 |
Kur symbol |
1 |
Stick logo – Agnoukaran ceremony |
2 |
crocodile |
1 |
Bow and arrow |
2 |
Fence symbol (Anv-astakya) |
1 |
Fetus symbol |
2 |
Varuna |
1 |
Table 3: Comb symbol appears in combination with all gods.
This comb symbol appears with various permutations and combinations with many gods. These multi-god combinations show that this ‘comb’ symbol conveys a general meaning, not a specific one. The general meaning of ‘offering’ fits very well. This
analysis is further clarified by the below-given ‘triplet symbols’ statistical analysis by Sundar et al. (1)
Triplets |
Meaning |
Frequency of occurrences |
|
Pithru-Kavu – offering |
46 |
|
Ka-Kavu- offering |
16 |
|
Dvi-Kavu-offering |
11 |
|
Sastha -Kavu- offering |
10 |
|
Ningishzida (Psychopomp)- Kavu- offering |
10 |
Table 4: Triplets statistical analysis.
The above table clarifies the idea very well. Maximum offerings have been made to ‘Pithrus’(ancestors). The second
most common offering is for ‘Ka’ (Dead man’s soul). Ten offerings are for the psychopomp ‘Ningishzida‘. The remaining ten offerings are oriented towards ‘Sasthas’, a generic name for ‘Gods’. Thus,
the statistical analysis shows that this ‘comb’ symbol is oriented towards a common term, not a specific god. The word ‘offering’ fits very well.
Bibliography
- Sundar, G., Chandrasekar,S.SureshBabu, G.C., Mahadevan,I. The-Indus-Script-Text-and- Context. WordPress/wp-content/uploads. [Online], 2010. http://203.124.120.60/wordpress/wp- content/uploads/43-The-Indus-Script-Text-and-Context.pdf.
- Sullivan, Sue. Indus Script Dictionary. S .l. : Suzanne Redalia, 2011.